Review



rhil‐1β (200‐01b)  (PeproTech)


Bioz Verified Symbol PeproTech is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 90

    Structured Review

    PeproTech rhil‐1β (200‐01b)
    IL‐17A and TNF synergistically induce genes involved in mesenchymal transition of mesothelial cells. (A) Synergistically induced genes of mesothelial cells treated as in Figure (n = 5 patients). Jitter plot of the calculated additive and the actually observed induction (FC) by TNF+IL‐17A treatment. The plot shows genes with a ≥2‐fold ratio (= <t>1</t> log2 unit) of observed/expected median fold change. (B) Molecular Signature (MSigDB) hallmark pathway analysis. <xref ref-type= 54 The bubble graph presents the 10 most significantly enriched pathways of synergistic candidate genes defined in (A) and the relative overlap with all genes of the respective pathway.(C) RT‐qPCR of EMT marker gene expression after treatment of mesothelial cells for 48 h with rhIL‐17A, rhTNF or both cytokines. Expression values were normalized to the untreated control (cntr). (D) qPCR analysis of selected EMT‐transcription factor genes performed as in panel B. Bar plots show the mean±SD of biological replicates (n = 5). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001 were determined by by one‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test; ns: not significant. " width="250" height="auto" />
    Rhil‐1β (200‐01b), supplied by PeproTech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/rhil%E2%80%901%CE%B2+%28200%E2%80%9001b%29/pmc10988119-113-20-24?v=PeproTech
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rhil‐1β (200‐01b) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-07
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Reciprocal crosstalk between Th17 and mesothelial cells promotes metastasis‐associated adhesion of ovarian cancer cells"

    Article Title: Reciprocal crosstalk between Th17 and mesothelial cells promotes metastasis‐associated adhesion of ovarian cancer cells

    Journal: Clinical and Translational Medicine

    doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1604

    IL‐17A and TNF synergistically induce genes involved in mesenchymal transition of mesothelial cells. (A) Synergistically induced genes of mesothelial cells treated as in Figure (n = 5 patients). Jitter plot of the calculated additive and the actually observed induction (FC) by TNF+IL‐17A treatment. The plot shows genes with a ≥2‐fold ratio (= 1 log2 unit) of observed/expected median fold change. (B) Molecular Signature (MSigDB) hallmark pathway analysis. <xref ref-type= 54 The bubble graph presents the 10 most significantly enriched pathways of synergistic candidate genes defined in (A) and the relative overlap with all genes of the respective pathway.(C) RT‐qPCR of EMT marker gene expression after treatment of mesothelial cells for 48 h with rhIL‐17A, rhTNF or both cytokines. Expression values were normalized to the untreated control (cntr). (D) qPCR analysis of selected EMT‐transcription factor genes performed as in panel B. Bar plots show the mean±SD of biological replicates (n = 5). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001 were determined by by one‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test; ns: not significant. " title="... treatment of mesothelial cells for 48 h with rhIL‐17A, rhTNF or both cytokines. Expression values were normalized ..." property="contentUrl" width="100%" height="100%"/>
    Figure Legend Snippet: IL‐17A and TNF synergistically induce genes involved in mesenchymal transition of mesothelial cells. (A) Synergistically induced genes of mesothelial cells treated as in Figure (n = 5 patients). Jitter plot of the calculated additive and the actually observed induction (FC) by TNF+IL‐17A treatment. The plot shows genes with a ≥2‐fold ratio (= 1 log2 unit) of observed/expected median fold change. (B) Molecular Signature (MSigDB) hallmark pathway analysis. 54 The bubble graph presents the 10 most significantly enriched pathways of synergistic candidate genes defined in (A) and the relative overlap with all genes of the respective pathway.(C) RT‐qPCR of EMT marker gene expression after treatment of mesothelial cells for 48 h with rhIL‐17A, rhTNF or both cytokines. Expression values were normalized to the untreated control (cntr). (D) qPCR analysis of selected EMT‐transcription factor genes performed as in panel B. Bar plots show the mean±SD of biological replicates (n = 5). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001 were determined by by one‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test; ns: not significant.

    Techniques Used: Quantitative RT-PCR, Marker, Expressing, Comparison

    IL‐17A and TNF perturb mesothelial monolayer integrity and promote adhesion of tumor cells. (A) Phalloidin staining of mesothelial cells treated with rhIL‐17A, rhTNF or both cytokines for 96 h. Medium and treatment were renewed after 48 h. Representative pictures are shown. (B, C) Quantification of ellipticity (B; Imaris software) and sphericity (C; ImageJ software) of experiments shown in panel A. Four random images were analyzed for each treatment condition and n = 4 patients. (D) ZO‐1 (green) and Hoechst (blue) staining of mesothelial cells treated as in panel A. The pictures are representative of three experiments with cells from different patients. (E) Quantification of ZO‐1 area at cell‐cell contacts with ImageJ software and the Labkit plugin. Three random images for each treatment condition were analyzed and n = 3 patients. (F) Schematic overview of the experimental design of the tumor cell adhesion assay. Mesothelial cells were seeded on 96‐well plates coated with collagen I, stimulated with rhIL‐17, rhTNF or both cytokines, and cultured for 4–5 days till formation of a dense monolayer. Subsequently, wells were washed and CellTracker Green‐stained tumor cells were added for 6 h. (G) Pictures of adherent OC‐tumor cells treated as described in panel F. Representative images are shown. (H) Quantification of adhesion assays as in panel G. Attached tumor cells were quantified by measuring the relative area covered by fluorescently labeled tumor cells using ImageJ software (n = 3 patients). The bar plots show the mean ±SD for biological replicates.*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001 were determined in panels B, E and H by one‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test, in panel C by Kruskal‐Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test: ns: not significant.
    Figure Legend Snippet: IL‐17A and TNF perturb mesothelial monolayer integrity and promote adhesion of tumor cells. (A) Phalloidin staining of mesothelial cells treated with rhIL‐17A, rhTNF or both cytokines for 96 h. Medium and treatment were renewed after 48 h. Representative pictures are shown. (B, C) Quantification of ellipticity (B; Imaris software) and sphericity (C; ImageJ software) of experiments shown in panel A. Four random images were analyzed for each treatment condition and n = 4 patients. (D) ZO‐1 (green) and Hoechst (blue) staining of mesothelial cells treated as in panel A. The pictures are representative of three experiments with cells from different patients. (E) Quantification of ZO‐1 area at cell‐cell contacts with ImageJ software and the Labkit plugin. Three random images for each treatment condition were analyzed and n = 3 patients. (F) Schematic overview of the experimental design of the tumor cell adhesion assay. Mesothelial cells were seeded on 96‐well plates coated with collagen I, stimulated with rhIL‐17, rhTNF or both cytokines, and cultured for 4–5 days till formation of a dense monolayer. Subsequently, wells were washed and CellTracker Green‐stained tumor cells were added for 6 h. (G) Pictures of adherent OC‐tumor cells treated as described in panel F. Representative images are shown. (H) Quantification of adhesion assays as in panel G. Attached tumor cells were quantified by measuring the relative area covered by fluorescently labeled tumor cells using ImageJ software (n = 3 patients). The bar plots show the mean ±SD for biological replicates.*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001 were determined in panels B, E and H by one‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test, in panel C by Kruskal‐Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test: ns: not significant.

    Techniques Used: Staining, Software, Cell Adhesion Assay, Cell Culture, Labeling, Comparison

    IL‐17A and TNF synergistically direct the secretome of mesothelial cells towards a Th17‐promoting environment. (A) Affinity proteomics analysis of the mesothelial cell secretome after 48 h treatment with rhIL‐17A, rhTNF or both cytokines. (B) Heatmap showing the top 50 significantly upregulated proteins after combined treatment (p <0.05 by paired t test; synergism defined as FC of combined treatment > added individual FC values x 1.5). FC values were protein‐wise normalized. (C) Bubble graph of synergistically induced proteins. Relative expression normalized to combined IL‐17A/TNF treatment is shown. (D) Schematic overview of the experimental design. CM from mesothelial cells treated with rhIL‐17A and rhTNF and from untreated cells were collected after 24 h. CD4 + cells from PBMCs were treated with CM for 8 days. Induction of Th17 was measured by flow cytometry. (E) Representative staining of CD4 + cells after treatment with CM from untreated compared to IL‐17A/TNF‐treated mesothelial cells. (F) Increase (FC) of IL‐17A + /IFNγ − cell frequency after treatment as in panel E. Bars show the mean ±SD of n = 11 biological replicates. ***p<0.001 was determined by two‐tailed unpaired t‐test.
    Figure Legend Snippet: IL‐17A and TNF synergistically direct the secretome of mesothelial cells towards a Th17‐promoting environment. (A) Affinity proteomics analysis of the mesothelial cell secretome after 48 h treatment with rhIL‐17A, rhTNF or both cytokines. (B) Heatmap showing the top 50 significantly upregulated proteins after combined treatment (p <0.05 by paired t test; synergism defined as FC of combined treatment > added individual FC values x 1.5). FC values were protein‐wise normalized. (C) Bubble graph of synergistically induced proteins. Relative expression normalized to combined IL‐17A/TNF treatment is shown. (D) Schematic overview of the experimental design. CM from mesothelial cells treated with rhIL‐17A and rhTNF and from untreated cells were collected after 24 h. CD4 + cells from PBMCs were treated with CM for 8 days. Induction of Th17 was measured by flow cytometry. (E) Representative staining of CD4 + cells after treatment with CM from untreated compared to IL‐17A/TNF‐treated mesothelial cells. (F) Increase (FC) of IL‐17A + /IFNγ − cell frequency after treatment as in panel E. Bars show the mean ±SD of n = 11 biological replicates. ***p<0.001 was determined by two‐tailed unpaired t‐test.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Two Tailed Test



    Similar Products



    Image Search Results


    IL‐17A and TNF synergistically induce genes involved in mesenchymal transition of mesothelial cells. (A) Synergistically induced genes of mesothelial cells treated as in Figure (n = 5 patients). Jitter plot of the calculated additive and the actually observed induction (FC) by TNF+IL‐17A treatment. The plot shows genes with a ≥2‐fold ratio (= 1 log2 unit) of observed/expected median fold change. (B) Molecular Signature (MSigDB) hallmark pathway analysis. <xref ref-type= 54 The bubble graph presents the 10 most significantly enriched pathways of synergistic candidate genes defined in (A) and the relative overlap with all genes of the respective pathway.(C) RT‐qPCR of EMT marker gene expression after treatment of mesothelial cells for 48 h with rhIL‐17A, rhTNF or both cytokines. Expression values were normalized to the untreated control (cntr). (D) qPCR analysis of selected EMT‐transcription factor genes performed as in panel B. Bar plots show the mean±SD of biological replicates (n = 5). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001 were determined by by one‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test; ns: not significant. " width="100%" height="100%">

    Journal: Clinical and Translational Medicine

    Article Title: Reciprocal crosstalk between Th17 and mesothelial cells promotes metastasis‐associated adhesion of ovarian cancer cells

    doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1604

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IL‐17A and TNF synergistically induce genes involved in mesenchymal transition of mesothelial cells. (A) Synergistically induced genes of mesothelial cells treated as in Figure (n = 5 patients). Jitter plot of the calculated additive and the actually observed induction (FC) by TNF+IL‐17A treatment. The plot shows genes with a ≥2‐fold ratio (= 1 log2 unit) of observed/expected median fold change. (B) Molecular Signature (MSigDB) hallmark pathway analysis. 54 The bubble graph presents the 10 most significantly enriched pathways of synergistic candidate genes defined in (A) and the relative overlap with all genes of the respective pathway.(C) RT‐qPCR of EMT marker gene expression after treatment of mesothelial cells for 48 h with rhIL‐17A, rhTNF or both cytokines. Expression values were normalized to the untreated control (cntr). (D) qPCR analysis of selected EMT‐transcription factor genes performed as in panel B. Bar plots show the mean±SD of biological replicates (n = 5). *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001 were determined by by one‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test; ns: not significant.

    Article Snippet: Th17 differentiation in RPMI 1640 was performed in the presence of recombinant cytokines rhIL‐6 (200‐06), rhTGFβ (100‐21), IL‐23 (200‐23) and rhIL‐1β (200‐01B; all from Peprotech, Cranbury, USA).

    Techniques: Quantitative RT-PCR, Marker, Expressing, Comparison

    IL‐17A and TNF perturb mesothelial monolayer integrity and promote adhesion of tumor cells. (A) Phalloidin staining of mesothelial cells treated with rhIL‐17A, rhTNF or both cytokines for 96 h. Medium and treatment were renewed after 48 h. Representative pictures are shown. (B, C) Quantification of ellipticity (B; Imaris software) and sphericity (C; ImageJ software) of experiments shown in panel A. Four random images were analyzed for each treatment condition and n = 4 patients. (D) ZO‐1 (green) and Hoechst (blue) staining of mesothelial cells treated as in panel A. The pictures are representative of three experiments with cells from different patients. (E) Quantification of ZO‐1 area at cell‐cell contacts with ImageJ software and the Labkit plugin. Three random images for each treatment condition were analyzed and n = 3 patients. (F) Schematic overview of the experimental design of the tumor cell adhesion assay. Mesothelial cells were seeded on 96‐well plates coated with collagen I, stimulated with rhIL‐17, rhTNF or both cytokines, and cultured for 4–5 days till formation of a dense monolayer. Subsequently, wells were washed and CellTracker Green‐stained tumor cells were added for 6 h. (G) Pictures of adherent OC‐tumor cells treated as described in panel F. Representative images are shown. (H) Quantification of adhesion assays as in panel G. Attached tumor cells were quantified by measuring the relative area covered by fluorescently labeled tumor cells using ImageJ software (n = 3 patients). The bar plots show the mean ±SD for biological replicates.*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001 were determined in panels B, E and H by one‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test, in panel C by Kruskal‐Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test: ns: not significant.

    Journal: Clinical and Translational Medicine

    Article Title: Reciprocal crosstalk between Th17 and mesothelial cells promotes metastasis‐associated adhesion of ovarian cancer cells

    doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1604

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IL‐17A and TNF perturb mesothelial monolayer integrity and promote adhesion of tumor cells. (A) Phalloidin staining of mesothelial cells treated with rhIL‐17A, rhTNF or both cytokines for 96 h. Medium and treatment were renewed after 48 h. Representative pictures are shown. (B, C) Quantification of ellipticity (B; Imaris software) and sphericity (C; ImageJ software) of experiments shown in panel A. Four random images were analyzed for each treatment condition and n = 4 patients. (D) ZO‐1 (green) and Hoechst (blue) staining of mesothelial cells treated as in panel A. The pictures are representative of three experiments with cells from different patients. (E) Quantification of ZO‐1 area at cell‐cell contacts with ImageJ software and the Labkit plugin. Three random images for each treatment condition were analyzed and n = 3 patients. (F) Schematic overview of the experimental design of the tumor cell adhesion assay. Mesothelial cells were seeded on 96‐well plates coated with collagen I, stimulated with rhIL‐17, rhTNF or both cytokines, and cultured for 4–5 days till formation of a dense monolayer. Subsequently, wells were washed and CellTracker Green‐stained tumor cells were added for 6 h. (G) Pictures of adherent OC‐tumor cells treated as described in panel F. Representative images are shown. (H) Quantification of adhesion assays as in panel G. Attached tumor cells were quantified by measuring the relative area covered by fluorescently labeled tumor cells using ImageJ software (n = 3 patients). The bar plots show the mean ±SD for biological replicates.*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ****p<0.0001 were determined in panels B, E and H by one‐way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's multiple comparison test, in panel C by Kruskal‐Wallis test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison test: ns: not significant.

    Article Snippet: Th17 differentiation in RPMI 1640 was performed in the presence of recombinant cytokines rhIL‐6 (200‐06), rhTGFβ (100‐21), IL‐23 (200‐23) and rhIL‐1β (200‐01B; all from Peprotech, Cranbury, USA).

    Techniques: Staining, Software, Cell Adhesion Assay, Cell Culture, Labeling, Comparison

    IL‐17A and TNF synergistically direct the secretome of mesothelial cells towards a Th17‐promoting environment. (A) Affinity proteomics analysis of the mesothelial cell secretome after 48 h treatment with rhIL‐17A, rhTNF or both cytokines. (B) Heatmap showing the top 50 significantly upregulated proteins after combined treatment (p <0.05 by paired t test; synergism defined as FC of combined treatment > added individual FC values x 1.5). FC values were protein‐wise normalized. (C) Bubble graph of synergistically induced proteins. Relative expression normalized to combined IL‐17A/TNF treatment is shown. (D) Schematic overview of the experimental design. CM from mesothelial cells treated with rhIL‐17A and rhTNF and from untreated cells were collected after 24 h. CD4 + cells from PBMCs were treated with CM for 8 days. Induction of Th17 was measured by flow cytometry. (E) Representative staining of CD4 + cells after treatment with CM from untreated compared to IL‐17A/TNF‐treated mesothelial cells. (F) Increase (FC) of IL‐17A + /IFNγ − cell frequency after treatment as in panel E. Bars show the mean ±SD of n = 11 biological replicates. ***p<0.001 was determined by two‐tailed unpaired t‐test.

    Journal: Clinical and Translational Medicine

    Article Title: Reciprocal crosstalk between Th17 and mesothelial cells promotes metastasis‐associated adhesion of ovarian cancer cells

    doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1604

    Figure Lengend Snippet: IL‐17A and TNF synergistically direct the secretome of mesothelial cells towards a Th17‐promoting environment. (A) Affinity proteomics analysis of the mesothelial cell secretome after 48 h treatment with rhIL‐17A, rhTNF or both cytokines. (B) Heatmap showing the top 50 significantly upregulated proteins after combined treatment (p <0.05 by paired t test; synergism defined as FC of combined treatment > added individual FC values x 1.5). FC values were protein‐wise normalized. (C) Bubble graph of synergistically induced proteins. Relative expression normalized to combined IL‐17A/TNF treatment is shown. (D) Schematic overview of the experimental design. CM from mesothelial cells treated with rhIL‐17A and rhTNF and from untreated cells were collected after 24 h. CD4 + cells from PBMCs were treated with CM for 8 days. Induction of Th17 was measured by flow cytometry. (E) Representative staining of CD4 + cells after treatment with CM from untreated compared to IL‐17A/TNF‐treated mesothelial cells. (F) Increase (FC) of IL‐17A + /IFNγ − cell frequency after treatment as in panel E. Bars show the mean ±SD of n = 11 biological replicates. ***p<0.001 was determined by two‐tailed unpaired t‐test.

    Article Snippet: Th17 differentiation in RPMI 1640 was performed in the presence of recombinant cytokines rhIL‐6 (200‐06), rhTGFβ (100‐21), IL‐23 (200‐23) and rhIL‐1β (200‐01B; all from Peprotech, Cranbury, USA).

    Techniques: Expressing, Flow Cytometry, Staining, Two Tailed Test